SINGAPORE – Singapore’s drug policy and penalties for drug abuse are determined by what the Republic considers the best interests of Singaporeans to be, and are not made in Kuala Lumpur or Bangkok, Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam said on Wednesday.
Neither are they dictated by anti-death penalty activists, or three or four international newspapers, he said in an interview with Bloomberg.
Mr Shanmugam was asked by Bloomberg Television’s Haslinda Amin about the effect evolving stances by regional countries on the use of controlled drugs, such as cannabis, had on Singapore.
The greater availability of drugs creates more challenges but a vast majority of Singaporeans understand they are bad for society, he said.
Thailand legalised the consumption of cannabis in June, while Malaysian officials have reportedly been considering its medical use recently.
Mr Shanmugam said: “There is a small group that thinks that it ought to be legalised. And because of the portrayal in popular media, younger people – not the majority – tend to have a slightly different view of cannabis, and these are all challenges we have to deal with.
“But you know, (Singapore) government policy doesn’t get made in Kuala Lumpur or Bangkok. Nor does it get dictated to by 400 people, or three or four international newspapers.”
He cited negative effects observed in other countries, such as a rise in bombings by drug-linked gangs in Sweden and the opioid crisis in the United States, where deaths from drug overdose spiked in the last decade.
“You look at all of this, and you tell me that Thailand has allowed cannabis a couple of months ago, and Malaysia is talking about it. Let’s look at the facts,” said the minister.
Earlier in the interview, Mr Shanmugam was asked what it would take for Singapore to change its stance on the death penalty.
Ms Haslinda cited human rights groups and British tycoon Richard Branson, who earlier this year urged clemency for the high-profile case of Nagaenthran K. Dharmalingam, a Malaysian who was executed in April for trafficking heroin to Singapore.
Mr Shanmugam replied there is an assumption that significant discourse and public support against the death penalty exist here.
“When activists who are against (the) death penalty organised a protest, they claimed that 400 people turned up,” he said, in apparent reference to one such gathering at Hong Lim Park in April.
But more than 80 per cent of Singaporeans polled by the Ministry of Home Affairs last year supported the death penalty, he said.
The Government’s task is to do right by Singaporeans and what is in the best interest of society, he said, adding that it believes the death penalty saves thousands of lives because of its deterrent effect.
“If 400 people plus three newspaper articles could change government policy, or if Mr Richard Branson could change government policy, then Singapore would not be where it is today,” he said.